Reconstructing the phylogeny of "Buarremon" brush-finches and near relatives (Aves, Emberizidae) from individual gene trees.

Gene trees are often assumed to be equivalent to species trees, but processes such as incomplete lineage sorting can generate incongruence among gene topologies and analyzing multilocus data in concatenated matrices can be prone to systematic errors. Accordingly, a variety of new methods have been developed to estimate species trees using multilocus data sets. Here, we apply some of these methods to reconstruct the phylogeny of Buarremon and near relatives, a group in which phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial DNA sequences produced results that were inconsistent with relationships implied by a taxonomy based on variation in external phenotype. Gene genealogies obtained for seven loci (one mitochondrial, six nuclear) were varied, with some supporting and some rejecting the monophyly of Buarremon. Overall, our species-tree analyses tended to support a monophyletic Buarremon, but due to lack of congruence between methodologies, resolution of the phylogeny of this group remains uncertain. More generally, our study indicates that the number of individuals sampled can have an important effect on phylogenetic reconstruction, that the use of seven markers does not guarantee obtaining a strongly-supported species tree, and that methods for species-tree reconstruction can produce different results using the same data; these are important considerations for researchers using these new phylogenetic approaches in other systems.